首頁Home / 安裝案例Cases / 將軍澳・私人屋苑Tseung Kwan O · Private estate

屋苑停車場Estate carpark

經法團審批,採用共用電錶方案,走線收納於天花線槽。業主自行申請三個月未果,我們接手兩星期內獲批。Committee approved, shared meter setup, cabling hidden in ceiling trunking. The owner tried for three months; we cleared it in two weeks.

屋苑停車場

現場情況

將軍澳一個約二十年樓齡的私人屋苑,地庫停車場。業主的車位在 B1 層近走火通道位置,距離電掣房約 25 米。

屋苑未參加 EHSS,車位亦冇預留掣位 —— 即是四種安裝情況之中的類型 4,最需要處理審批的一種。

最棘手的地方

不是技術,是文件。

業主自己去管理處申請,來回了三個月仍然未有結果。過程大致是這樣的:

  1. 第一次提交 → 管理處說要有圖則
  2. 補上圖則 → 說要有負載計算
  3. 補上負載計算 → 說要承辦商牌照副本
  4. 補上牌照 → 說要公眾責任保險證明
  5. 補上保險 → 說下次法團會議先討論,而會議在一個半月後

每一次補件,都等於重新排隊。這不是管理處刁難,而是他們本身也不清楚應該一次過要求什麼。

我們點做

1. 一次過交齊文件包

我們接手之後做的第一件事,是把所有可能被要求的文件一次過準備好:

  • 安裝位置圖則及走線圖
  • 電力負載計算(包括停車場現有尖峰用量、加裝後用量、餘量)
  • EMSD 註冊電業承辦商牌照副本
  • 註冊電業工程人員牌照副本
  • 公眾責任保險證明
  • 充電樁的 CE / EMC / LVD 測試報告
  • 保護裝置說明(Type A 30mA + 6mA DC 偵測)

最後兩項通常冇人主動交,但正正是回應「會唔會有火警風險」這條問題的關鍵。

2. 主動處理法團最關心的三件事

在文件裏面直接寫明:

  • 費用全部由業主承擔,不涉管理費
  • 現有停車場總容量足夠,加裝後餘量仍然充裕(附數字)
  • 將來如有其他業主加裝,現有線路預留了擴充空間

3. 電錶方案:選共用

我們替業主計過兩條數。他每月充電約 120 度,屬於用量偏低那一組,獨立電錶的前期成本要好多年才攤薄,所以建議用屋苑共用電錶、按用量分攤。業主同意。

4. 走線收入天花線槽

25 米走線全部收納在停車場天花的線槽內,沿現有喉管路線走,不外露、不影響觀感。這一點對法團審批亦有幫助 —— 他們最怕的其中一件事是「整到停車場好核突」。

結果

遞交後兩星期內獲批,之後半日完成安裝。

由三個月零進展,到兩星期通過,分別不在於我們認識誰,而在於第一次就交齊了他們會問的所有東西。

這個案例適合誰參考

如果你在私人屋苑,而申請已經拖了一段時間,通常問題出在補件循環而不是被拒絕。

值得做的一件事:直接問管理處「請問完整的所需文件清單是什麼?」,要求一次過列齊。如果他們列不出,那份清單可以由我們提供。

WhatsApp 告訴我們你的屋苑名稱同現時卡在哪一步,我們可以幫你看看下一步應該點行。

The site

A roughly twenty-year-old private estate in Tseung Kwan O, basement carpark. The owner's bay is on B1 near the fire exit, about 25m from the switch room.

The estate never joined EHSS and there's no outlet at the bay — making this Type 4 of the four installation situations, the one where approval is the whole battle.

The hard part

Not the engineering. The paperwork.

The owner had been going back and forth with management for three months with nothing to show. Roughly:

  1. First submission → management asked for drawings
  2. Drawings supplied → they asked for load calculations
  3. Load calculations supplied → they asked for the contractor's licence
  4. Licence supplied → they asked for public liability insurance
  5. Insurance supplied → they said it would be discussed at the next committee meeting, six weeks away

Every round of missing documents meant rejoining the queue. This wasn't obstruction — management genuinely didn't know the full list to ask for in one go.

What we did

Submitted the complete pack at once.

The first thing we did was assemble everything that could possibly be asked for:

  • Installation position and cable routing drawings
  • Electrical load calculation (existing carpark peak, demand after addition, remaining headroom)
  • EMSD registered electrical contractor licence copy
  • Registered electrical worker licence copies
  • Public liability insurance certificate
  • The charger's CE / EMC / LVD test reports
  • A protective-devices note (Type A 30mA plus 6mA DC detection)

Nobody volunteers those last two, and they're exactly what answers the "is this a fire risk" question.

Addressed the committee's three real worries directly.

Stated plainly in the documents:

  • The owner pays for everything; management fees are not involved
  • The carpark's existing capacity is sufficient and headroom remains ample after the addition (with figures)
  • The installed route leaves expansion capacity for other owners later

Meter choice: shared.

We costed both routes. At about 120 kWh a month he's in the lower-usage group, where a dedicated meter's upfront cost takes many years to amortise — so we recommended the estate's shared meter with apportioned billing. He agreed.

Cabling hidden in ceiling trunking.

All 25m runs inside trunking in the carpark ceiling, following the existing services route — nothing exposed, nothing visually intrusive. This helps with approval too: one of the committee's real fears is the carpark ending up looking a mess.

The outcome

Approved within two weeks of submission, then installed in half a day.

The difference between three months of nothing and two weeks to approval wasn't who we know — it was submitting everything they were going to ask for, the first time.

Who this case is useful for

If you're in a private estate and your application has dragged, the problem is usually the missing-document loop rather than an actual refusal.

One thing worth doing: ask management directly for the complete list of required documents, in one go. If they can't produce one, we can.

WhatsApp us your estate name and where things are stuck, and we'll help you work out the next move.

你的物業與這個案例相似?Does your place look like this one?

傳送車位及電錶相片,我們會告知最接近哪一種情況、需時多久及費用多少。Send photos of your bay and meter. We'll tell you which case yours resembles, how long, and how much.

其他案例More cases

您好!請留下您的車位地址及車位相,即時報價。Hi! Send us your bay address and a photo for an instant quote.